A wierd type of velocity.

I would just like to say that there are probably many things wrong with this paper, and the arguments herein. However, I find it quite interesting, the outcome that is, although I have no clue as to its physical meaning (if any).

A brief history:
This text comes from an idea of looking at some fundamental aspects and looking at them from a fundamental point of view, taking nothing for granted. The idea is to use conversion constants based on the idea of discrete space-time. We use 'c' as the conversion from space to time and visa versa, but 'k' would be used to convert miles into kilometers, where we can say that miles is the fundamental length (ie. plancks length). The two fundamental equations used are momentum and velocity.

Given that:

Velocity = s/t
Momentum = E/V = Et/s

we can introduce the two conversion constants 'c' and 'k'. In the case of velocity we obtain

Velocity = kv/c = ks/ct.

The reason for having 'k' ontop of the equation and 'c' at the bottom is for the comversion of 't' into meters and then 'k' for the conversion of the lengths from the fundamental lengths.
For momentum we obtain

Momentum = Ect/ks

Using the basic values of

s = P (Planck's length)
t = P/c

we can check that

Velocity = P/(P/c)
= c

and

Momentum = E(P/c)/P
= E/c

We can already note that by introducing a velocity constant (c) at the bottom of the equation, in the case of velocity, the above constant must also be in the form of a velocity, thus balancing the equations. Now introducing the two conversion constants we get

Velocity = kP/c(P/c)
= k

and

Momentum = Ec(P/c)/(kP)
= EP/kP
= E/k

Momentum = E/Velocity

----------------------

Velocity = Vs/ct
= V^2/c

Momentum = Ect/Vs
= Ec/V^2

-Fraser Scott, sometime this year (2000)